Search for: "State v. Armes" Results 1 - 20 of 11,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
-linked assets held outside the United States that would clear through the U.S. financial system. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
There's surely a right to informational privacy at some level, but the biographical information at issue isn't all that intimate, and it's protected from public dissemination anyway, and the text of the Second Amendment only covers the right to bear arms, not to keep the stuff secret from a Legislatively-chosen group of researchers who are helping the Legislature draft policy, particularly when numerous other public officials already have unchallenged access to this same… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:41 am by Unreported Opinions
The court then found Appellant guilty on […] The post EMMANUEL AKUM v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
In an effort to create unified legislation at the European level, a resolution for the return of artworks and cultural goods looted in armed conflicts was proposed based on the HEAR Act and adopted by the European Parliament in 2019. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm by Francis Pileggi
“We stated in MFW that the special committee must be independent, not that only a majority of the committee must be independent,” the high court said’,  “A special committee created to secure the protections of MFW should function “in a manner which indicates that the controlling stockholder did not dictate the terms of the transaction and that the committee exercised real bargaining power at an arm’s length. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]