Search for: "State v. B. Rose"
Results 1 - 20
of 635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
She received a California County Counsels’ Litigation Award for preparing an amicus brief on behalf of the California State Association of Counties in Elisa B. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 10:39 am
” Sarkissian v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
The recent panel decision in Rose v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-China Economic and Security Review Commission“China and the Middle East”Testimony by:Jon B. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
Rose v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Due to technological innovation in the late twentieth century, that 0.5% rose to 7% by 2019. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
…In any event I have in my first judgment indicated that I will grant a faculty for the etching of a rose to appear on the headstone. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Supreme Court’s reasoning in Paroline v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
Their verified complaint alleges that plaintiff [B] was walking in front of defendant's property when she tripped and fell on a defective sidewalk condition, sustaining injuries, and plaintiff stated in her verification that these allegations were true to her own personal knowledge. [read post]
