Search for: "State v. Bainbridge"
Results 1 - 20
of 244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm
The en banc high court partially reversed a Court of Chancery decision that the derivative suit must be dismissed because IAC met the requirements of independence set by the milestone opinion in Kahn v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
Bainbridge, kindly linked to this post on his eponymous blog. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:33 pm
— Steve Bainbridge (@PrawfBainbridge) January 31, 2024 Reading Tornetta v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222 (1980). [3] Dirks v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:35 am
Bainbridge, Tamar Frankel, Sean J. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
In Coster v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
Stated differently, these derivative suits concern internal corporate affairs—matters that are traditionally governed by state corporate law and, therefore, more sensibly litigated in the Delaware Chancery. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Bainbridge kindly invited me to provide this update. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:04 pm
v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 5:44 pm
Why We Should Keep Teaching Dodge v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
Laster is quite correct when he quotes extensively from prior Delaware Supreme Court decisions stating that “the fiduciary duties of officers are the same as those of directors. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:36 pm
” SEC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:15 am
Having read Professor Stephen Bainbridge's post about the origins of the judicial doctrine that directors must act on an informed basis, I passed along a reference to the California Supreme Court's in Fox v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm
Heaton and Todd Henderson July 18, 2022 Thank you to the inestimable Steve Bainbridge for allowing us the opportunity to discuss the Twitter v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]