Search for: "State v. Biby"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 9:01 am
And is the new Israeli government headed by Bibi Netanyahu to blame? [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
As Hill J in Aldi Stores Ltd Partnership v Frito-Lay Trading Co GmbH [2001] FCA 1874, [30] stated: In most, if not all cases, the question whether there has been use as a trade mark will be determined by an objective examination of the use in the context in which it appears.His Honour, in considering whether consumers would perceive the name Delphine as a badge of origin, stated: … the context or setting in which consumers viewed the EDMs [electronic direct mail]… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
The public authority ought to recognise that there had been a promise or representation and, where it is considering reneging on such a promise, this ought to be taken into account in the decision making process (R (Bibi) v Newham London Borough Council [2002] 1 WLR 237). [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In Bibi v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
Overall, it is difficult to reconcile Akhtar, Ejaz and Bibi. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The present judgment therefore allowed the Supreme Court to hold that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Parvaz Akhtar [1981] QB 46 and Bibi v ECO (Dhaka) [2007] EWCA Civ 740 were wrongly decided. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
By Ben Coughlan and Bibi FellDefamation law is “…a forest of complexities, overgrown with anomalies, inconsistencies, and perverse rigidities. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
Mrs Ali and Mrs Bibi relied on these points in their challenge to the rule, which now forms a part of Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
However she stated since this was not a remedy sought by the appellants the Court should invite further submissions before finally deciding the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
The court used the opinion in Qadri v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
This is an unusual qui tam action, United States of America, Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
Regina (Aguilar Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AIRE Centre and others intervening) Regina (Bibi and another) v Same (Same intervening) [2011] UKSC 45; [2011] WLR (D) 291 “An immigration rule designed to deter forced marriages, which prevented the granting of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a spouse if either of the parties to the marriage was aged under 21, was an unjustified interference with the right to… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:08 am
Technologies on the stand : legal and ethical questions in neuroscience and robotics edited by Bibi van den Berg & Laura Klaming. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
