Search for: "State v. Bradley A. Anderson"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 8:00 am
Erie Construction Mid-West LLC, case no. 3:23-cv-02060-K) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In addition to paying $99,000, the company has agreed to other undisclosed relief – which likely included injunctive relief and the modification of the company’s policies and practices.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson noted that, “The… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that “Federal law requires employers to accommodate sincerely held religious beliefs if reasonable accommodation can be made without causing undue burden to the business. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
In addition to compensating the employee, the company has agreed to modify its polices and practices to ensure compliance with the law.In a written statement, Bradley Anderson, district director of EEOC’s Birmingham office, observed, “An employer has a duty to protect its employees from a hostile environment of frequent or serious sexual harassment when it knows of the ongoing harassment ….It is an unacceptable and unlawful practice to ignore complaints and… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm
Anderson to discuss the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Dec. 1 ruling in Trump v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1873, in Bradwell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
United States, a case involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 8:25 am
Amanda Tyler compared this ruling to Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:09 pm
Takushi (1992) and Anderson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Elena Chacko analyzed on the Israeli Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tabish v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am
When the White House sought to silence her, claiming that she had signed a non-disclosure agreement, Bradley P. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:00 pm
Bradley P. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
