Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 1 - 20
of 37,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Wright argues that he and Cohen had a fiduciary relationship because Petrokansky stated that Cohen would act as Wright’s attorney. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Retirement Investors For purposes of the new test, the Final Rule has added a new definition for the recipients of investment advice: Term Definition Retirement Investor a plan, plan participant or beneficiary, IRA, IRA owner or beneficiary, plan fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA section (3)(21)(A)(i) or (iii) Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the plan, or an IRA fiduciary within the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the IRA. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Anthropic PBC,[49] in which the defendants (the rights holders) were able to present clear examples of the reproduction of their lyrics by Claude, Anthropic’s AI tool.[50] Similarly, The New York Times was able to demonstrate in The New York Times Company v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:10 am
In Alsyrawan v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:38 am
See Sheetz of Del., Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
C. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Among other things, the VGFN Constitution included a residency requirement stating that all Chief and Councillors must reside on the VGFN’s settlement land, in the village of Old Crow in the traditional territory of the Vuntut Gwitchin, or relocate there within 14 days of their election. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:31 am
Susan V. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been… [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:45 pm
In fact, there are three key takeaways in Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
