Search for: "State v. C. S. K." Results 1 - 20 of 2,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
Defendant AJP Educational Foundation, Inc. a/k/a American Muslims for Palestine(“AMP”) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation incorporated in California with its principal place of business in Falls Church, Virginia. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:28 pm by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion nevertheless makes clear that “half-truths,” as distinguished from pure omissions, remain actionable under Item 303 of Regulation S-K. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm by John Stigi and Kristin Housh
§ 77k(a), prohibits any registration statement that “omit[s] to state a material fact required to be stated therein. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
As demand plateaued in the United States and began to fall in Europe, it wasChina’s growth that kept global demand growing. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]