Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1 - 20 of 15,248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
  The Input, which consists of an analysis of the Helpdesk framework and a set of suggestions and recommendations for the concept's further development, follows below. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am by Giles Peaker
AK brought the present JR, asserting that: a) the policy discriminates indirectly against women without proper justification contrary to s19 and thus s29 of the Equality Act 2010 b) Westminster was in breach of the Public Sector Equality Duty in failing to assess the policy’s impact, and c) the policy amounted to a breach of Article 14 ECHR obligations, read with Article 8. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:27 am by Mark S. Humphreys
 This is pointed out in the 2001, United States Supreme Court opinion styled, Egelhoff v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Live testimony of a vocational expert can occur only on a showing of good cause [ see [b], below ]. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Amber M. Rogers, Keenan Judge
Circuit”) partially overturned a decision issued by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) in Absolute Healthcare d/b/a Curaleaf Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Background (based on the outline provided by the DSC’s decisions)  X (appellant) obtained a judgment in the United States against Y (appellee), which then sought to enforce it in Canada (Ontario) via a motion for summary judgment. [read post]