Search for: "State v. Cardamone"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2020, 8:51 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:41 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 12:07 pm
This seems consistent with United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:14 pm
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
Focusing on federalism grounds, Judge Cardamone dissented in relevant part. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 5:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 9:26 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
But in a new opinion released Oct. 11 in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:57 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 1:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:53 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
