Search for: "State v. Chang "
Results 1 - 20
of 50,195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 9:39 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
National Security Archive v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Rather than changing the law (for example by creating a presumption of shared care as father’s rights groups had argued Norgrove should recommend), the new provision effectively codified the longstanding approach of the family courts that contact between a child and both of her parents was generally a welfare benefit to the child – a prior de facto presumption underpinned by and expounded in years of appellate authority and human rights law (i.e. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:55 pm
Westrick v Dorcon Group, LLC, 2024 WL 2857912 (VA 6/9/2024) [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
New on the Bound By Oath podcast: the story of Berman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:43 am
As the letter states: The Proposal would do more than simply overturn Moelis. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
The proposed UN Cybercrime Convention, scheduled for a critical concluding session from 29 July to August 9th, poses a significant threat to global human rights unless major changes are made. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:38 am
In Midler v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
In McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
AFGHAN AND IRAQI ALLIES, UNDER SERIOUS THREAT BECAUSE OF THEIR FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE UNITED STATES, ON THEIR OWN AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:47 am
In Sharfman M.D.P.A. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
(People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
Although the state initially opposed habeas relief, it changed its position when the case reached the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; it agreed that Escobar’s federal due process rights had been violated and that he was entitled to have his capital conviction overturned. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
., Goddard v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm
” Nat’l Petroleum Ref’rs Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:40 am
And he wrote an excellent concurrence (page 25) explaining why:COPYRIGHTPaywall schmaywallBlacklock's Reporter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Some of the most common examples in Canada include: Secretly taking pictures of or recording a roommate in their bedroom; Using a “peephole” to watch someone changing or bathing in a private room; and Installing a hidden camera in a public restroom to record its users. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
