Search for: "State v. City Court of City of Tucson"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2016, 8:30 am
Supreme Court’s direction, the city cannot dictate religious viewpoints or the content of a prayer. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
From Tucson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
City of Tucson, et al., No. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 9:45 am
Sept. 20, 2015, 1-4:30 PM, Tucson, AZ, University of Arizona, Rogers College of Law: Constitution Day panel on notable Supreme Court cases of the most recent term. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:51 pm
City of Tucson, et al., No. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:51 am
” State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:21 am
Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm
But the clerk is a state official, not a city official, so you shouldn't have sued the city. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
Sanchez (Tucson, AZ)CaliforniaMGM v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
At Overlawyered, Walter Olson comments on the Court’s denial of mandamus in Comer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:53 am
” McNaughton v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:53 am
” McNaughton v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
Duties include representing Tribal members in criminal and civil Tribal Court and State court matters. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:34 pm
Jane Doe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am
Carrigan, in which the Court will consider whether states may prohibit a government official from voting on an issue in which he may have a personal conflict. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
