Search for: "State v. Columbo"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2023, 4:14 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm
The Court’s subsequent ruling in Castaneda v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:38 pm
Columbo pretended to be a fool when, in fact, Columbo had played the interviewed party for a fool! [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:21 pm
Sometimes, to briefly state the facts of the case is sufficient itself to state the appropriate holding:"A vexatious litigant’s request to sue his attorneys for legal malpractice was denied by the superior court, as was his motion for reconsideration of that request. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:21 am
An April 2016 decision by the federal appeals court in Chicago in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
Gorsuch wrote an opinion in 2008 in US v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:43 pm
For this, the SCOV peeks through the lens of United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
Carl Folsom won in State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:23 am
The opinion in Richard Lynn Winfrey v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:48 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:58 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
That, I might add, plus the potential injustice of having admiralty law govern what would ordinarily be a routine negligence claim; here, the defendant is trying use admiralty law to preempt a state law tort claim and limit their liability to the $6,005 value of the Jet Ski under the Shipowners Limitation of Liability Act -- an Act that almost assuredly did not contemplate governing situation like those here.When I say this is a good test case for the maxim, I don't think it strongly… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 2:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
