Search for: "State v. Croft" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 11:44 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Philipp Stompfe, The Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main Is the First European Court to Declare the Achmea Case a Landmark Decision with Significance for All Intra-EU BITS Julien Chaisse & Arjun Solanki, Raiffeisen Bank International AG V Croatia, ICSID Case No arb/17/34 Malcolm Robach & Velislava Hristova, The Renewed Role of States in Investment Arbitration – Report of the 6th EFILA Annual Conference 2021 Tim Maxian Rusche, How to Enforce the Achmea Judgment… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that a California city prevailed yesterday in its effort to avoid Supreme Court review of a regulatory-takings case, in 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:25 am by Amy Howe
The justices declined to take up the property-rights question presented by a California case, 616 Croft Avenue v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit exceeded the proper scope of federal habeas review by setting aside a state criminal sentence based on a putative federal due-process right to specific performance of a plea agreement that was superseded and withdrawn, in accordance with state law, before the entry of judgment. 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am by John Elwood
(Relisted after the October 13 conference)   Returning Relists 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the September 25 and October 6 conferences)   616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which invoked Chevron and approved the FHWA’s interpretation, conflicts with Chevron itself. 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
Supported by an even larger army of amici than 616 Croft Avenue, Ohio and 10 other states seek to revisit that decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:35 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Illegal sentence — Restitution In the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Erika Lynne Laws, the appellant, was charged with filing a false document, that is, the will of William Van Croft, III (“the Will”), and perjury by affidavit. [read post]