Search for: "State v. Cross #2" Results 1 - 20 of 7,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2024, 1:04 pm by Shawn Dominy
  The United States Supreme Court found admission of the report violated the defendant’s confrontation rights because:  (1) the analyst’s report was ‘testimonial’; (2) the defendant did not have an opportunity to cross-examine the analyst; and (3) the report was offered for the truth of the matter asserted in the report:  the substance was cocaine. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
But one also needs to cross refer to other subsections that were introduced and which define the parameters and operation of this provision. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As relevant to the instant motion, on July 2, 2001, the New York City Civil Court grantedPerlberger a $37,043.75 money judgment against plaitniff in the action entitled Per/berger v Lutin, Index No. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
These are, for instance, the non-discrimination clause in Article 19 TFEU, or Article 81(3) TFEU as regards aspects of family law with cross-border implications. [read post]