Search for: "State v. D. Collins" Results 1 - 20 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Wednesday 12 June 2024, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in George v Cannell and another [2024] UKSC 19 On the same day there was a preliminary issues trial before Collins Rice J in the case of Bridgen MP v Hancock MP KB-2023-002309. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Collins Rice J ruled that a hearing should take place to decide whether the posts were statements of fact or opinion. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Harris, Director of the Franklin D. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
§ 794(a)], sue his employer for its alleged failure to accommodate his sleeping disorder [see Collins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 14 December 2023 there was a set aside application in the case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
Given the wide ranging and large scale of his more recent projects, it seems likely that more and more artists are contributing to Banksy’s work under his moniker.[21] Many of his works have grown to include artists such as John D’oh, James AME72 Ame, and Damien Hirst, who himself has been charged with being Banksy.[22] Whatever the case, Banksy’s identity is simultaneously a closely guarded secret and an open one. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU… [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am by Frank Cranmer
” The CJEU and religious dress at work On 29 November, the CJEU will hand down judgment in the latest case on religious dress at work: OP v Commune d’Ans Case C‑148/22, which is a request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]