Search for: "State v. David A. King"
Results 1 - 20
of 697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 6:53 am
TaxProf Blog op-ed: Reflections on the King v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:14 pm
David H. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Predicting the Fallout from King v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:54 am
Kaye (Stanford Law School and Penn State Law) have posted A Brief of Genetics, Genomics and Forensic Science Researchers in Maryland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this two-part series, I contended that the reading of the Obamacare statute offered by the plaintiffs in the important King v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:30 am
Penn State law professor David Kaye has devoted much of his career to examining just this question. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:17 am
Kaye (Penn State Law) has posted Maryland v King: Per Se Unreasonableness, the Golden Rule, and the Future of DNA Databases (Harvard Law Review Forum, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:56 pm
The Roundtable includes: Nancy King, Introduction: Skilling v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
(See here for analysis by David Kaye defending the no-new-search position and this Note defending the opposite view.) [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
This time the fuss is about already critically acclaimed [The New York Times critic in residence, AO Scott, called it "a triumph of efficient, emphatic cinematic storytelling"] biopic Selma, starring David Oyelowo as the Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:00 pm
David H. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:08 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:17 am
Pre-emption can also protect against state interference with the national economy.In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:47 am
In a letter dated today to King & Spalding chairman Robert Hays, NRA general counsel David Lehman said the firm's decision was "indefensible" but emphasized that the NRA's action in dropping King & Spalding is "not motivated by any position on the statute itself. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:49 am
Here is the abstract: In a line of cases beginning with United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
All eyes are on next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:26 am
As my co-blogger Dan Solove noted, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
