Search for: "State v. Deal"
Results 1 - 20
of 29,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 12:16 pm
From Amin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
Although the state seemed to have conceded the issue, it drew some attention in the briefs, a great deal of attention at argument, and some discussion in the majority opinion and in two concurrences. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:33 am
Salinas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
The judgment was later confirmed by the Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal’s ruling No. 31/2024 of 29 January 2024 but subsequently overturned by the aforementioned ADSC’s decision reported here.[5] It is worth recalling that, in this particular case, the ADSC clearly stated that the Civil Marriage Law does not apply to foreign Muslims irrespective of their origins. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:29 am
Delman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
For example, Question 2(c) asks whether serial acquisitions encourage “actual or attempted coordination or collusion between competitors” and Question 3 posits nine subparts about ways in which an acquirer might harm competition, including tying and refusals to deal. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
They would transform how the United States deals with people already living in the country — both lawfully and unlawfully — and also remake the policy governing people coming to the country, both directly from abroad and at the border. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
To date, the UN system has not developed sufficient structures or tools to further reinforce implementation support, including systematic data gathering, wide-ranging capacity-building, or a global “help desk” for businesses, States, civil society and other stakeholders. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:18 am
Furthermore, the PDP Project proposal must now include information on “intellectual property, exclusivity contracts or commercial agreements, including details of any agreements or restrictions on licensing or 3rd-party access to the technology” (Annex CX, article 8, V). [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 8:30 am
Ravi v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
See Olson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:25 pm
In the 8-1 decision, the Court appeared to offer a looser interpretation of the gun rights afforded by the Second Amendment than the previous landmark ruling in New York Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:30 pm
The Court stated longstanding precedents plainly establish that, when dealing with an entity’s undistributed income, Congress may either tax the entity or tax its shareholders or partners. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:07 am
See State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:50 am
Ark.) in For AR Kids v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 9:59 am
The contracting officer responded stating that under FAR Clause (FAR 52.249.10) dealing with fixed priced contracts, epidemics (such as Covid-19) that impact the critical path will entitle the contractor to a no-cost extension of time and the government grants the contractor a 66-day extension of time. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm
Colorado in Mapp v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine and Garland v. [read post]
