Search for: "State v. Dingle"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 1:13 pm
The post TAIRON DINGLE v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:38 am
Co-workers thought plaintiff was gay, and they ridiculed him over this and subjected him to obscene and lewd remarks.The case is Dingle v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:30 am
The answer is a qualified "no", according to a recent decision by New York County Commercial Division Justice Herman Cahn in Dingle v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There has been previous comment here on the various stages of Banks v Cadwalladr, and the facts have been well-stated. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
The judgment also stated that the rule in Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371 (according to which where several persons have published words to the same or similar effect it is not legitimate for a defendant to seek to reduce damages by proving the publications of the defendant or others and inviting an inference that those other publications have injured the claimant’s reputation) remains applicable to a section 1(1) determination, as it would not make… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Defendant was therefore found to have invited an inference of bad reputation derived from other damaging publications, contrary to the rule in Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am
Former New York County Justice Herman Cahn gets credit for the most-cited decision concerning a challenge to compensation-based dilution with his 2008 decision in Dingle v Xtenit, Inc., 20 Misc 3d 1123(A) [Sup Ct 2008] (discussed here). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Smith, 375 N.C. 152, 2020-NCSC-45, ¶ 16; State v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:38 am
In Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Ors ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) Warby J applied (and endorsed) the principle, established in Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371, that every republication of a defamatory statement is a new publication and creates a fresh cause of action for the person defamed (see [74]-[86]) (whilst we await the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lachaux, there is currently no information available on when this will be handed down). [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Field Fisher Defamation Law Blog “Lachaux Part 2: the rule in Dingle and the timing of likelihood of serious harm“, Nathan Capone, Scandalous! [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am
The Metropolitan Police stated that the journalist’s home was searched as part of an investigation into suspected terrorism offences under sections 1 and 2 of the Terrorism Act. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 3:26 pm
(See, e.g., the 2 Live Crew case, Campbell v. [read post]
