Search for: "State v. Dunn" Results 1 - 20 of 959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374; [2008] WLR (D) 110 “In the context of CPR Pt 11, the limitation provisions within s 7(5) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provided a defence to a claim rather than going to jurisdiction, so that a failure to apply to strike out within 14 days of acknowledging service did not preclude a defendant from applying to strike out a claim on the basis of limitation. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am by emagraken
Dunn states that if you intend to contradict an opposing witness on a significant matter you must put the contradictory version of events to the witness on cross examination. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by The Federalist Society
Dunn involved the scope of a state’s duty, identified by the Supreme Court in its 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:44 am
When you're litigating against the United States, there are lots and lots of ways to lose. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
To the extent that the state court based its conclusion on the IQ score of 75, the Court cited Hall v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
In 1948, the Supreme Court outlawed these practices in the seminal case, Shelly v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]