Search for: "State v. Dwyer" Results 1 - 20 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
NYC immigration attorney Paul O'Dwyer states that "It agrees with the Fourth and Ninth Circuits [Etape v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am by SHG
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by The Editor , CMS
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Ella Wells, a trainee patent attorney at CMS, comment on the decision which is awaited in the matter of Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am by SHG
She stated that in February 2010 Ms. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by UKSC Blog
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Frances Denney, a trainee patent attorney, comment on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Actavis Group PTC EHF and Ors v ICOS Corporation and Anor [2019] UKSC 15. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Stated otherwise, the question of proximate cause is not resolvable on this motion to dismiss (see Schroeder v Pinterest Inc., 133 AD3d 12, 26 n 7 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 2:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Stated otherwise, the question of proximate cause is not resolvable on this motion to dismiss (see Schroeder v Pinterest Inc., 133 AD3d 12, 26 n 7 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]