Search for: "State v. E. N. W."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
See Brief for United States 23, n. 3. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm
” Nat’l Petroleum Ref’rs Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
State v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
” Petrella, 572 U.S. at 670 n.4. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
§ 254(d) that would require federal Universal Service Fund contributions by ISPs: “[W]e believe that any decisions on whether and how to make BIAS providers contribute to USF funding are best addressed holistically in [] ongoing discussions of USF contribution reform, on a full record and with robust input from all interested parties, than in this proceeding. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Kristalina Georgieva, the managing director of the IMF, stated in a press briefing in 2022 that « [w]e also are pressing for some of the changes, legal changes that need to happen in [New?] [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The Court derived the test’s first prong from “the bedrock requirement that ‘the conduct allegedly causing the deprivation of a federal right be fairly attributable to the State,’” asserting that “[a]n act is not attributable to a State unless it is traceable to the State’s power or authority. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
See also Assured Partners, Inc., 2015 IL App (1st) 141863 at ¶ 42 (refusing to blue pencil overbroad non-solicitation clause and holding that “[w]e decline to rescue a drafter from the risks of crafting a restrictive covenant that is patently overbroad”); Arcor, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Tal como nas fórmulas do patético de Aby Warburg, não se distingue nelas criação e performance, original e cópia. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
Mesa Bankruptcy Law Office 4065 E University Dr #500 Mesa, AZ 85205(480) 470-0005 Phoenix Bankruptcy Law Office 668 North 44th Street, Suite #300 Phoenix, AZ 85008(480) 833-8000 Glendale Bankruptcy Law Office My AZ Lawyers 20325 N. 51st Ave. [read post]
