Search for: "State v. Emery"
Results 1 - 20
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
Emery, and her parents Constance M. and Paul V. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:54 pm
Here is the abstract: On the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:19 am
United States the... [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:03 pm
Federal courts typically certify state law issues when they're presented on direct appeal and in settings in which the state courts have had no opportunity to opine on the particular issue. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 7:04 am
Listen to the episode here: Pharma Fallout: How Harrington v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
A recent Delaware Court opinion, Bay Center Apartments Owner, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 7:13 am
Moreover, defendants’ legal malpractice counterclaims were not sufficiently intertwined with the account stated claim so as to preclude summary judgment (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]). [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:25 pm
Earlier this week, in a case entitled, Emery Celli Brinkerhoff & Abady, LLP v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
Guttenberg v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Anyone desiring a copy of Judge Burke’s Order without Opinion and/or my preliminary objections and supporting brief in the Emery v. [read post]
D.S.D.: Recording of telephonic search warrant request showed issuing judge was neutral and detached
13 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:03 pm
Emery D. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Defendant’s failure to consolidate her legal malpractice action, which she commenced subsequent to this legal fees action, precludes review of whether her claim is sufficiently intertwined with the account stated cause of action (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:07 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 10:08 pm
Certainly it’s no State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am
“Nevertheless, plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the account stated claim cannot be granted as to the other amounts billed, because plaintiff has not demonstrated entitlement to dismissal of defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaims, which are sufficiently intertwined with the account stated claim so as to provide a bona fide defense (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm
The article uses the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:41 am
“The attorney-client privilege is the oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to the common law” (Upjohn Co. v United States, 449 US 383, 389; see Spectrum Sys. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
