Search for: "State v. Fips"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
This week, the Sixth Circuit weighed in on the intersection between unhelpful shortcuts and jury deliberations in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:53 am
If a state failed to adopt an approvable SIP by the deadline, EPA would impose its own Federal Implementation Plan (or FIP) to achieve the necessary reductions. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Texas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:11 am
Both states requested summary judgment for an order setting deadlines by which the EPA must promulgate FIPs for these defaulting states. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
The majority of states only require notification in the “most expedient time possible” or “without unreasonable delay. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 12:46 pm
For example, a contractor selling medical devices to the Department of Veterans Affairs may fall under different safeguarding and reporting requirements than a contractor providing cloud services for an educational agency or a state university. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 9:08 am
<> Arizona DEQ v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 7:20 am
Should states refuse to develop their own SIPs, however, the EPA has the authority to impose a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to achieve the same level of emission reductions. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:20 am
See, FIP Realty Co. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:35 am
[Postscript: Given all the discussion of federalism questions related to King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
In in South [Dakota] v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in EME Homer City v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
Agency v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am
In this case, though, the material is pretty tough: NAAQS (national ambient air quality standards), SIPs (state implementation plans), and FIPs (federal implementation plan). [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Texas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Texas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:38 am
(No. 12-1182), and American Lung Association, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
