Search for: "State v. Floyd Y."
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
One such legal battle was seen in the state of North Carolina, in Soc’y for the Hist. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
California v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Furthermore, Senator William Pitt Fessenden of Maine warned that removing the President for his speech would not only "den[y] him a right secured to every other citizen of the republic . . . but might deprive the people of the benefit of his opinion of public affairs. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
In Branti v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
(Lawfare) State of Maryland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 8:07 am
"] From Judge Gary Sharpe's opinion today in Soos v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Hunton Andrews Kurt Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “EDPB Releases Statement on Restrictions on Data Subject Rights in Connection with the State of Emergency in Member States”. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Wade y acá Doe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
China Economic and Security Review Commission was created on October 30, 2000 by the Floyd D. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
Significantly, in the present cases Kitchin, Floyd and Sales LJJ went a stage further than Bibi and decided that if X adopts the identity of Y, where Y is a false identity created by X and X acquires the characteristics needed to obtain citizenship by using the identity Y, the purported grant of citizenship to X as Y is a nullity. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Mississippi, 14-10486, and Floyd v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
Unclear how far the Court had gone, and remains unclear; Court hasn’t taken a commercial speech case since then, though it has had Reed v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Lord Justice Floyd in Lilly has adopted a purposive approach in relation to indirect infringement. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Floyd Y. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 12:42 pm
El Pais now reports that “acting in opposition” to the Fiscalía (think of it like our District Attorney), a higher state authority (the State Bar which defends the interest of Spain’s Treasury) wants the case to proceed. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
The court held in State v. [read post]
