Search for: "State v. Freund" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm by David Bernstein
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  “Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Specifically, defendants’ receipt and retention of plaintiff’s accounts, without objection within a reasonable time, and agreement to pay a portion of the indebtedness, gave rise to an actionable account stated, thereby entitling plaintiff to summary judgment in its favor” (Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Edelman, 160 AD2d 626, 626, 559 NYS2d 249 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Madison (1803), Ex parte McCardle (1869), and City of Boerne v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 11:30 am by William Eskridge
” Harvard Professor Paul Freund told Congress that the ERA’s plain meaning would bar state discrimination against “homosexuals,” who were coming out of their closets. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Edelman, 160 AD2d 626, 626 [1st Dept 1990].) [read post]