Search for: "State v. GC" Results 1 - 20 of 461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
On May 20, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) filed applications for arrest warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
The last four months in the DSA news feel like two years. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
While GC memoranda are not binding and do not represent the views of the Board or federal appellate courts, several complaints have adopted the GC’s theory. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
The other two are APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P) and SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here)). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm by Frank Cranmer
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 12:36 pm by Jonathan L. Israel
The amended law seems clearly at odds with long-standing National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) precedent (Babcock v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am by Maksym Vishchyk
First, as noted above, POWs can be prosecuted for international crimes, including grave breaches of IHL (III GC Cmt §3634), commonly referred to as “war crimes. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
  GCs can be named as defendants On March 20, 2023, shareholders in Meta Platforms, Inc. filed a detail derivative complaint in Delaware Chancery in Employees’ Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island, et al. vs. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Interestingly, the EU doesn’t mention the United States, which is arguably the most significant country yet to implement an effective site-blocking regime. [read post]