Search for: "State v. H. Samuels Co." Results 1 - 20 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” To the same effect was language from a plurality opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia a decade earlier in 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct)  lcb11@psu.edu     Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Barry Winograd
Co-op Banking Group, the Ninth Circuit left issuance of a stay to judicial discretion. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Trump’s Authoritarian Presidency”Expert Statement Bright Line WatchJohn Carey (John Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences, Dartmouth College), Gretchen Helmke (Thomas H. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
Kabat, “Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer: A Critical Assessment,” in H. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
15 May 2022, 7:38 am by Russell Knight
R. 341(h)(3) Identifying Errors In An Illinois Appeal The errors will be in the court’s findings. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with legitimate privacy and religious… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Samuel Bray
For an initial summary, here is co-blogger Jonathan Adler. [read post]