Search for: "State v. Hicks #1" Results 1 - 20 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 9:17 am by Kalvis Golde
Hicks 23-324Issues: (1) Whether a cause of action exists under Bivens v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
Dancy, 83 N.C. 608, 609 (1880) (quoting 1 Hale’s P.C. 628); accord State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
UN(x)) Where W(x) represents a real number social utility value for some state of affairs (or possible world) X, F is some increasing function that yields a real number, U1(x) is a cardinal, interpersonally comparable utility value yielded by some procedure for individual 1 for state of affairs X, and N is the total number of individuals. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
UN(x)}, where F is some increasing function, U1 is the utility of state of affairs X for individual number 1, and so forth. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
George Hicks (Kirkland) is counsel of record on the other side. [read post]
In the case pending before the 3rd Circuit, a group of Division 1 student athletes from several states filed a lawsuit in the U.S. [read post]