Search for: "State v. Hinson" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Ashley Hinson stated that they introduced the latest EATS Act (S.2019/H.R.4417) in direct response to the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Dallas-based property management company, Alden Short and Hinson Jennings, LLC (“Alden Short”) will pay $85,000 and furnish other relief under a consent degree entered in the EEOC v. [read post]
Cal. 2020) (citing statistics that only 2.5% of Uber trips crossed state lines and only 10% of all trips began or ended at airports); Hinson v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  A reply is not meant to buttress allegations in the petition or to belatedly add assertions that should have been in the petition (Appeal of Nappi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,300; Appeal of Caswell, 48 id. 472, Decision No. 15,920; Appeal of Hinson, 48 id. 437, Decision No. 15,908). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  A reply is not meant to buttress allegations in the petition or to belatedly add assertions that should have been in the petition (Appeal of Nappi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,300; Appeal of Caswell, 48 id. 472, Decision No. 15,920; Appeal of Hinson, 48 id. 437, Decision No. 15,908). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  A reply is not meant to buttress allegations in the petition or to belatedly add assertions that should have been in the petition (Appeal of Nappi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,300; Appeal of Caswell, 48 id. 472, Decision No. 15,920; Appeal of Hinson, 48 id. 437, Decision No. 15,908). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  A reply is not meant to buttress allegations in the petition or to belatedly add assertions that should have been in the petition (Appeal of Nappi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,300; Appeal of Caswell, 48 id. 472, Decision No. 15,920; Appeal of Hinson, 48 id. 437, Decision No. 15,908). [read post]