Search for: "State v. J. L. B." Results 1 - 20 of 2,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[56] Among survivors, at least 5 percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[57] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
After all, the legal framework of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act is over 90 years old. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Crown can then rebut this presumption for the purposes of the analysis under the curative proviso in s. 686(1)(b)(iv). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  “[L]ocal school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained [there]in …” (Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. [read post]