Search for: "State v. Jose R."
Results 1 - 20
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm
The Cyrus R. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 10:04 am
On April 25th, he notified the State Elections Department that he was once again re-designating back into County Court Group 29.Group 31Judge Christopher Green v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
Leroy v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
David R. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
And these are just the possibly sympathetic figures: For others, see the Bible's account of Judas, or any book noting the deaths of Hitler, Himmler, Goering, or Goebbels. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
And these are just the possibly sympathetic figures: For others, see the Bible's account of Judas, or any book noting the deaths of Hitler, Himmler, Goering, or Goebbels. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Even in the context of prevention of secrecy in government, "the public interest in protecting the privacy of noise complainants and in preventing a chilling effect on complaints, clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure of complainants' names…" City of San Jose v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
From Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
A change in the progressivity of a state tax structure promotes migration and changes the allocation of resources within the state. [read post]
2 May 2022, 5:16 pm
Cindy V. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
Auxin Solar is a domestic manufacturer of modules based in San Jose, California, which affirmatively asserts standing as a producer of like products to those for which it is requesting the investigation. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:31 am
Chang v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Clarence N., 110 A.D.3d 430, 430–431, 972 N.Y.S.2d 245 [1st Dept. 2013]; Matter of Jose M. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:42 am
From today's decision in City of Newark v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 3:33 pm
Action: Consider and discuss approval of candidates for 2022-23 SBOT President-elect: Jose “Joe” Escobedo Jr. and Cindy V. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 1:07 pm
The State Bar of Texas Board of Directors’ Nominations and Elections Subcommittee voted today to recommend the nomination of Jose “Joe” Escobedo Jr., of Edinburg, and Cindy V. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:26 am
Cooper v. [read post]
