Search for: "State v. Labella" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division's decision is set out below:   Matter of LaBella v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 05801 Decided on November 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division's decision is set out below:   Matter of LaBella v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 05801 Decided on November 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am by Dwight Sullivan
”  Labella, 15 M.J. at 229 (quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm by Dwight Sullivan
”  Labella, 15 M.J. at 229 (quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” That rule blocked many early lawsuits.In 2006, the state amended its charitable immunity law to allow religious organizations to be sued for their sexual offenses. [read post]