Search for: "State v. Leisinger"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 12:18 pm
Workers’ Comp Ruling In 2002, however, the entire panel of workers’ compensation judges decided in the case of Navarro v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:01 pm
By Amy Leisinger, J.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:57 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:29 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:35 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:14 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:59 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:15 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:05 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:43 am
“The board well understood that the deal had been struck,” the court stated. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.A D.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
Under Exchange Act Section 16(b) and Rule 16b-6, the entities were required to disgorge profits only up to the amount of the premium received by the writer of the put, the panel stated (Olagues v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 9:50 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.A Second Circuit panel vacated a judgment to the extent that the district court denied leave to amend to add securities fraud claims. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:40 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. has filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to overturn the Second Circuit’s decision that the tolling rule set forth in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:27 am
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed chancery court decisions appointing a custodian to sell a highly profitable, yet managerially dysfunctional company and requiring one of the company’s CEOs to pay over $7.1 million in sanctions to his business partner in connection with litigation misconduct. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
Circuits and urge the Supreme Court to the Second Circuit’s holding in Doscher v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
As the dissent in the Court’s Dirks v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
The court permanently enjoined the defendant from further violations and ordered payment of nearly $650,000 in disgorgement and penalties (SEC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Because of this ambiguity, under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]