Search for: "State v. Levitt"
Results 1 - 20
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
This issue was most recently litigated in Faizian v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
This issue was most recently litigated in Faizian v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
From Doe 107 v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Nebraska and Arizona v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
Court documents filed in the Walters v State of Western Australia case detail substantial allegations of abuse and human rights violations against children held at the Banksia Hill Detention Centre. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Levitt-Ansca Towne Park P’ship v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
Petitioners have not met their "burden of establishing unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt" (O'Conner v Levitt, 51 A.D.2d 1090). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
Petitioners have not met their "burden of establishing unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt" (O'Conner v Levitt, 51 A.D.2d 1090). [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Matthew Levitt wrote about the Syrian government’s facilitation of the Islamic State’s survival in an effort to discredit the broader Syrian opposition. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
Levitt, Esq.Lee M. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
However, in a concurring opinion in Bush v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:23 pm
Thompson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 10:46 am
Levitt. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:14 am
Levitt. [read post]