Search for: "State v. Luttig"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 11:35 am
Judge Luttig and Laurence Tribe in the Altantic: The Supreme Court of the United States did a grave disservice to both the Constitution and the nation in Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” Those words from the Supreme Court in its Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If the Supreme Court were to rely on the concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
Respected conservative former federal appeals court judge Michael Luttig had also made that point to Mike Pence just before January 6, 2021.(4) The factual predicate for the plot that Eastman (and Chesebro) hatched was that state and federal courts had ordered or allowed departures from the letter of state election law--and that these allowances deprived state legislatures of their constitutiona [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Stencil v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Citing the Supreme Court opinion in McCulloch v Maryland (1819) where our first Chief Justice John Marshall’s endorsement of the Constitution as a document intended to be read, understood, and applied by NON-lawyers, Luttig and Tribe, along with my colleague Anjani Jain of Yale encouraged me to author this essay. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
Yes, that Mike Luttig. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:27 am
" As U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 3:00 pm
And the Supreme Court, in Gravel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:17 pm
Nothing a state legislature does under the authority of Moore v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
That's former judge Michael Luttig on Moore v. [read post]
