Search for: "State v. McMorrow"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of McMorrow v Hevesi, 6 AD3d 925, the Appellate Division said that it has only recognized "active duty, which excludes temporary and intermittent . . . service in any reserve . . . force," for purposes of claiming member service credit pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §1000 and Military Law §243(1)(b). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm
Interestingly, given the amount of attention arbitration has gotten in recent years in state supreme courts around the country implementing the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
One of them is McMorrow v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Cir. 2009); Torres v. [read post]