Search for: "State v. Merchandise Seized"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
United States. [read post]
26 May 2014, 11:00 am
That opportunity dissolves if Customs seizes the merchandise before the case is brought before the United States Court of International Trade. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am
Counsel for the defendant adds:ICE: Artifacts seized in US v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court.Injunctions -- Temporary restraining order -- Inexcusable delay -- Motion for TRO to prevent the sale of counterfeit merchandise outside concert venue is denied where plaintiff's decision to wait until seven days prior to concert to seek injunctive relief constituted inexcusable delay resulting in a manufactured emergency violative of local rules and Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure -- TRO is also deniable on basis that plaintiff neglected to estimate the number of… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
The present case differs from U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:11 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) seized the items.The federal district court has consolidated this new case of U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
Before DLW could move the merchandise, the police seized the stash. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Ali United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:15 pm
Ramadan remains a fugitive from justice.Cultural property seized in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:38 am
ICCS USA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 1:19 pm
Given the circumstances, McDaniel thought it best to check Hatfield's inventory for other stolen merchandise. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
§ 545 (fraudulent importation of merchandise into the United States), § 2314 (interstate and foreign transport of stolen merchandise), § 2315 (concealment, storage, and sale of stolen property), and/or 19 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
The post Putin v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
’ State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
TAYLOR, P.A., Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
In Hatfield v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:13 am
In any event, the consent judgment includes $600k payment to Square Enix, so yes, the infringers WILL think twice about doing this again.In another press release dated Feb. 12, 2008, the lawsuit was noted to have been filed and was "a result of cooperation with the United States Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Patrol, whose agents seized a crate of counterfeit replica swords. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
§ 1595a(c)(1)(A), which says, "Merchandise which is introduced or attempted to be introduced into the United States contrary to law shall be ... seized and forfeited if it is stolen, smuggled, or clandestinely imported or introduced." [read post]
