Search for: "State v. Muller "
Results 1 - 20
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:23 pm
Justice Michael Lee stated in his judgment that they were uncontradicted by any evidence in reply from Lehrmann. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Muller The right to vote is a fundamental right, one belonging to the citizens of all free governments. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
, Anderson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Smotherman, Reading Between the Wines: Granholm v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
Over on the Election Law Blog, Derek Muller has a post examining Trump's merits brief in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 8:50 am
See Perry v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
See Part II of Derek Muller’s amicus brlef.) [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:04 pm
Louisiana, court grants rehearing en banc for state”: Wesley Muller of Louisiana Illuminator has this report. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]