Search for: "State v. N. L." Results 1 - 20 of 5,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
LinkedIn Corp., 31 F.4th 1180, 1186 n.4 (9th Cir. 2022) (hereinafter “hiQ 2022 Circuit opinion”); see also hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
Canada On 7 May 2024, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed the appeal in Simán v Eisenbrandt, 2024 BCCA 176 (CanLII). [read post]