Search for: "State v. Nakayama"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 6:51 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr and Dave Nakayama [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
When Chief Justice Ron Moon and Justices Steve Levinson and Paula Nakayama of the Hawai‘i Supreme Court did accept the sex discrimination argument in Baehr v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
SCWC-16-0000807 (Apr. 30, 2020) (changing foreclosure math; concurring and dissenting opinion by Nakayama, J. in which Recktenwald, C.J., joins); and Haynes v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
SCWC-16-0000807 (Apr. 30, 2020) (changing foreclosure math; concurring and dissenting opinion by Nakayama, J. in which Recktenwald, C.J., joins); and Haynes v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:29 pm
In a 3-2 decision, decided on April 30, 2020, in Hawaiiusa Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:29 pm
In a 3-2 decision, decided on April 30, 2020, in Hawaiiusa Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:43 am
” In Wright v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
In State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:29 pm
Last week the Hawaii Supreme Court heard arguments in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
Justice Nakayama issued separate opinions in State v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:09 pm
Earlier today, the Hawaii Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kaleikini v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:44 pm
The Hawaii Supreme Court just concluded oral arguments in Kaleikini v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:52 pm
Justice Nakayama issued a dissenting opinion in State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
HAWSCT Opinions State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
HAWSCT Opinions State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:41 pm
Steigman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm
Ginoza from a SDO in the criminal case State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:02 pm
Judge Ginoza issued 1 concurring opinion from an SDO in a criminal case State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
Justice Nakayama’s dissent is available here. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
The court recognized prior Hawaii case law (Winslow v. [read post]
