Search for: "State v. Nations" Results 1 - 20 of 46,428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
If the applicant shows that he is registered as patent proprietor in the national registers of the relevant Contracting Member States (as 10x Genomics did in this case), there is a rebuttable presumption that he has standing to sue. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Three years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm by Guest Author
Circuit in 1973 in the landmark case of National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:45 am by Keegan McBride
The United States has declared that flagship Chinese technology companies, such as Huawei and ZTE, pose national security risks and should have limited access to its markets as a result. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Breach of Fiduciary Duties; National Indian Forest Resources Management Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Lundeen v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
National authorities are thus required to recognise the parental bonds legally established in another Member State. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, showed that the top three nations with the highest maternal death rate were the United States, Chile and New Zealand. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]