Search for: "State v. Needs" Results 1 - 20 of 71,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Breach of Fiduciary Duties; National Indian Forest Resources Management Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Lundeen v. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
If reaching unanimity among the 27 Member States is generally challenging, this becomes even more complex when the file concerns a topic on which Member States’ sensibilities and approaches differ dramatically. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
”A need for maternal health equityRacial disparities in maternal death rates persist not only in the United States but in other parts of the world where some women have less access to postpartum support, according to the new report. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Tobin Admin
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the state court’s grant of the motion on the claims against the police officer’s individual capacity as he was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am by Melissa Stewart
COSIS now has nine member States and membership is open to all 39 members of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]