Search for: "State v. Nicole Jackson" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:56 pm by Michael C. Duff
ShareFrom the beginning of Monday’s oral argument in Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Oscar Markus
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, suggesting the court was about to overturn Roe and later cases like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
After both had completed a course on Linguistic Analysis of Legal Texts at the GSU College of Law, they conducted independent research during the Spring 2022 semester prompted by the question posed by Justice Samuel Alito on December 1, 2021, at oral argument in Dobbs v Jackson’s Women’s Health: “[C]an it be said that the right to abortion is deeply rooted in the history and traditions of the American people? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
He stated: “In my judgment, the question as to whether a faculty should be granted to remove the organ must be considered on its own merits and it cannot be the case that its disposal is simply a necessary consequence of the construction of a new fire exit. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Monday, July 11, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2021] EWCA Civ 18 (heard 16 December 2020 by Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ and Sir Richard McCombe). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 16 December 2020 (McCombe, Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]