Search for: "State v. Niemeyer "
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 8:01 pm
In Kadel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
California (1973) (obscenity) United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Pix Credit here The jurisprudence of the Religion Clauses in the United States has long been plagued by the doctrine that distinguishes between governmental speech and private speech. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded today in Peltier v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
Judge Niemeyer dissented and would have affirmed the district court in all respects. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:22 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc in Doe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
A second warrant issued for the search of the computer itself, based on the same information. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:30 am
See American Legion v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:26 am
The rational-basis issue and whether the court should refer to the reasoning in either Trump v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
White and Oncale v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The three Republican judges on the emoluments panel decision were: Paul V. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:07 pm
In Manning v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:15 pm
; Article III states: “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution … [and] to Controversies … between a State and Citizens of another State. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
” ; The latter, Judge Gregory noted, was simply what courts do on a regular basis. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
” ; The latter, Judge Gregory noted, was simply what courts do on a regular basis. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
” ; The latter, Judge Gregory noted, was simply what courts do on a regular basis. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
IRAP v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
This is the final part of a five-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
