Search for: "State v. Novotny" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]