Search for: "State v. Oram" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2022, 6:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
”… See also via LLRX – Fenced-off culture, the privatized Internet, and why book publishers lean on a 30-year-old doctrine – Andy Oram, prolific author, editor, publisher, and technical expert on all aspects of computing, undertook an extensive examination of a game changing case, Hachette v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 10:56 am by Giles Peaker
The necessity of a Tribunal finding on payability before a s.146 could be served was itself enough to bring the legal costs under clause 3.10.1, with reference to Freeholders of 69 Marina, St Leonards-on-Sea v Oram (2011) EWCA Civ 1258, (2012) L. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:00 am by Unknown
Blog posts & press:Fleeing persecution: experience of LGBTI asylum seekers in Australia (International Bar Association, April 2021) [text]ORAM and Rainbow Railroad Announce Kakuma Refugee Camp Research Project (ORAM, April 2021) [text]President Biden’s LGBTQI+ Memorandum Protects Refugees & Asylum Seekers: What Else Can Be Done? [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
On costs claimed by the freeholder, Freeholders of 69 Marina, St Leonard’s on Sea v Oram (2011) EWCA Civ 1258 was not, on this particular issue, decided per incuriam. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:29 am by Apostolos Anthimos
Hence, the court of the second state may not deny recognition and enforcement on the grounds of perceptions which run contrary to the European perspective. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr Oram gives evidence that he stayed in Flat 39 now and then, as does Mr Lea. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm by Apostolos Anthimos
The difference lies in the defendants: Unlike the Orams case, the respondent here was a foreign State. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:57 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 79271 (WD MI, June 11, 2014), a Michigan federal district court, although dismissing a number of defendants on immunity grounds, permitted an inmate to proceed against the warden, the chaplain and the state on his complaint that authorities refused to recognize separately and accommodate the practices of the Ismaili branch of the Moorish Science Temple.In Oram v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:11 am by tracey
Supreme Court Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 32 (9 November 2011) Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1257 (09 November 2011) Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GMBH & Ors v Carefusion 303 Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1288 (08 November 2011) SH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1284 (08… [read post]