Search for: "State v. Osler" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
Under the counter-measures doctrine, States can violate their own international legal obligations to induce the target state to “bring its conduct into compliance with international law. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Reviewed by Michael Woods. __________________ [1] Enbridge Energy Ltd. v State of Michigan, 2020 USDCWDMSD, Case 1:20-cv-01141 ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Online: < https://www.eenews.net/assets/2020/11/25/document_ew_05.pdf> [2] Enbridge Energy LP, supra note 1 at 1. [3] U.S.C. 6 [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Its stated purpose is to benefit all persons, especially persons with disabilities, with a “Canada without barriers” in specified areas, including employment and the built environment. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:41 am by Patricia Hughes
According to one commentary on the case, Osler’s, the judgement was unanimous. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Since the precipitous drop in United States law school enrolments began close to a decade ago, enrolments system wide have been cut in half. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 6:23 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Daniel Wong of Osler, Hoskins & Harcourt LLP looked at the statutory leaves of absences under the ESA, and the basis for which employers can request information for these leaves. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
” However, Justice Osler added the wrinkle that “the person so undertaking must know that he has no such power. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm by Howard Knopf
   As Justice John Evans, the  dean of administrative law in Canada, stated in the judicial review decision:[74] In the absence of a request from experienced counsel acting for a sophisticated client, fairness did not, in the circumstances of this case, require the Board to disclose copies of the SOCAN agreements on its own motion. [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Illinois lawyer Shawn Collins of The Collins Law Firm on the firm’s blog, Pollution Law Watch “Consent” in the Wake of State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
’ [Mark Bennett & Mark Osler, The Wrong People Decide Who Goes To Prison, CNN.com December 3,2013. . . .] [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the context of claims for malicious prosecution, the Court of Appeal for Ontario stated in Oniel v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 10:32 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal says the province can “take up” land for mining and forestry without conducting separate consultation with the federal government.On March 18, in Keewatin v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Footnote 7 Revisited: Can Jurors Bring Evidence into the Deliberation Room? [read post]