Search for: "State v. Paredes"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 12:15 pm
L. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:04 am
The opinion is styled, Thomas Paredes and Kerry Paredes v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
Véase El Condominio: El Régimen de Propiedad Horizontal en Puerto Rico (2nda Ed. 2019). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
(See Loss, Seligman & Paredes, Securities Regulation, a Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory U.S. publication, at Chapter 8.A.1.). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 1:04 pm
It is organized by the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de derecho y Consejería Presidencial para los Derechos Humanos and will take place martes (Tuesday) 20 y miércoles (Wednesday) 21 de marzo (March) 2018 at the Pontifical University in Bogotá Columbia (Building Jorge Hoyos Vásquez, SJ AUDITORIUM ALFONSO QUINTANA, SJ Floor 3, Carrera 7 # 40b 36 (Tuesday) and (Building No. 95, Manuel Briceño Jáuregui SJ, SJ AUDITORIUM VASQUEZ JAIME… [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
NTSB (4th Cir. 2003); Paredes v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:38 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:24 am
Christoph Schreuer, Víctor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile: Barely an Annulment ArticlesCarolyn B. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:56 am
And finally, on June 20, 2011 the Court held in the Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
As SEC Commissioner Troy Paredes pointed out in dissenting from adoption of new Rule 14a-11, proxy access marks a considerable displacement of state corporate law by federal securities regulation: Rule 14a-11’s immutability conflicts with state law. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
The FPPC then states that by analogy this guidance applies to consulting work that an investment adviser provides to a California state pension plan, meaning that under the “limited circumstances of performing trades” for a state pension plan “under its direction,” the employees performing those trades would not need to register as lobbyists. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
Miguel Paredes v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:00 am
As for the Blasius doctrine, the decision in Portnoy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
Jorge Mario Paredes-Cordova
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
30 May 2009, 6:45 am
DCA1996); Paredes v. [read post]
