Search for: "State v. Parra" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:39 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Parra, The 2022 Amendments of the Regulations and Rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes: Change and Continuity Special Issue: International Investment Law and Climate Change Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, Hélène Ruiz Fabri, & Stephan W. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:09 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Case CommentsAgora: Víctor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of ChileAntonio R Parra, Víctor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile: ‘ICSID’s Longest-Running Case’ An introduction to the Agora Niccoló Ridi, Víctor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile: Layers of Preclusion Danielle Morris & Cem… [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
Unsatisfied by partial reforms following widespread education protests in 2011, the metro fare rise has proved the spark that has awoken Chile’s formidable student body, according to psychiatrist and writer Marco Antonio de la Parra. . . . [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Menaker, The Consequences of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration Alain Pellet, Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate Mark Feldman, Denial of Benefits after Plama v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Walter, The Abiding Role of State-State Engagement in the Resolution of Investor-State Disputes Omar E. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Kevin
Ariz. 1992) (plaintiff fell through thin ice on a lake) Parra v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Third Circuit’s decision in Glaxo is distinguishable from the Ninth Circuit’s position on a similar issue in Parra v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
  Before moving on to the second part of its analysis the court distinguishes this case from other recent federal cases[8] by stating that none of those cases had addressed the issue at hand - a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
  Before moving on to the second part of its analysis the court distinguishes this case from other recent federal cases[8] by stating that none of those cases had addressed the issue at hand - a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:35 am by Monroe Freedman
Stanford’s court-appointed attorneys -- Scardino & Fazel partners Ali Fazel and Robert Scardino, solo John Parras and Ken McGuire of the McGuire Law Firm – no longer want to defend Stanford, the former chairman of Houston’s Stanford Financial Group (SFG).The lawyers allege in their Jan. 11 motion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:35 am by Monroe Freedman
Stanford’s court-appointed attorneys -- Scardino & Fazel partners Ali Fazel and Robert Scardino, solo John Parras and Ken McGuire of the McGuire Law Firm – no longer want to defend Stanford, the former chairman of Houston’s Stanford Financial Group (SFG).The lawyers allege in their Jan. 11 motion in United States v. [read post]