Search for: "State v. Pelham"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
CommentAs stated, this is going to be a key referral for the (further) construction – and de facto unification (!) [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:54 pm
In Village of Pelham Manor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Appeal, in Pelham Stephanus Bothma and Others v Tertius Bothma N.O and Another (Case number 748/2019) [2021] ZASCA 46 (15 April 2021), re-affirmed the position regarding the interpretation of legal documents, re-stating the principle that only admissible evidence of context, conservatively applied, may be led in resolving an interpretation dispute. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:00 am
Seuss Enterprises v. [read post]
[Guest Post] 21 and illegal in all states? The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegal
5 May 2020, 1:20 am
Here's what he has to say on Pelham:Norwegian RectangleAlan HuiTwo decades into the Pelham v Hütter saga, the German Federal Court of Justice has confirmed when sampling is illegal under German copyright law. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
This means that Member States might (though they are not obliged to) “address that dynamic concern by granting rightholders ‘rights to receive fuller information’. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 10:18 am
However, the exercise of that freedom may be subject to restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, with regard to (among other things) the rights of others.As a matter of principle, it is important to recall that the ECHR regulates a state's obligations to individuals and does not have a direct effect on the civil liability in proceedings between individuals.When it comes to criminal liability for copyright infringement, the European… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:37 pm
Ltd & Rhodia Operations S.A.S. v Neo Chemicals and Oxides Limited & Neo Performance Materials Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am
Luckily (or unluckily) the CJEU has finally handed down its judgment very recently.As a short primer, the case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider‑Esleben concerned the song "Metall auf Metall" created by the band Kraftwerk, which comprises of the respondents Hütter and Schneider‑Esleben. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am
Luckily (or unluckily) the CJEU has finally handed down its judgment very recently.As a short primer, the case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider‑Esleben concerned the song "Metall auf Metall" created by the band Kraftwerk, which comprises of the respondents Hütter and Schneider‑Esleben. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Although it has been admitted by the NIKE legal representatives that Kawhi Leonard had submitted a design, they have gone on to state that it is a false claim that the design was the “Claw” design, as reported in the Bulletin. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am
Bush in December 2001, handed down a decision, Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am
Prior to the full CJEU decision, Advocate General Szpunar gave his consideration on the matter in late 2018.The case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben concerned the band Kraftwerk (a well-known German electronic music band), consisting of the claimants Mr Hütter and Schneider-Esleben. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am
Prior to the full CJEU decision, Advocate General Szpunar gave his consideration on the matter in late 2018.The case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben concerned the band Kraftwerk (a well-known German electronic music band), consisting of the claimants Mr Hütter and Schneider-Esleben. [read post]
